Thank you for confirming your English comprehension problem.
From the article you dismiss:
“The reason why New York Times reporters are acting like rats fleeing a sinking ship with respect to the CIA’s war in Ukraine is that the Ukraine ship is sinking. Don’t take my word for it. The new US Intelligence Assessment for 2025 states 1) that Ukraine (the CIA) has substantially lost the conflict, and 2) nothing that the West has at its disposal will turn the situation around. Having a chair to sit in when the music stops is the political needle being threaded.
Russia in the past year has seized the upper hand in its full-scale invasion of Ukraine and is on a path to accrue greater leverage to press Kyiv and its Western backers to negotiate an end to the war that grants Moscow concessions it seeks. dni.gov.”
Further from the article:
“For those who may have forgotten, here is the leader of the Blue Team telling us that ‘Putin has already lost the war’ in mid-2023. Two years later, the New York Times is belatedly informing us that it was the Ukrainians who lost the war; that the US is blameless, if not heroic, for its ‘support’ of Ukraine; and that maybe the US should have gotten one-million citizens of a more deserving nation killed for the privilege.”
Now I am sure this won’t penetrate your ignorance but for others who can read I wanted to point out facts that show you don’t have a clue of whence you speak.
So like I said, the article you linked to contains some, possibly out of context quotes from a NYT article, which for some reason you didn't link to directly. Notice the quotes in question don't contain any facts, just opinion.
> Attacking the vehicle instead of the facts shows how insipid your viewpoint is.
What facts? The vehicle is all you have.
So the truth is you can’t read or you can’t comprehend the written word. Sad.
Your argument literally amounts to "Counterpunch said the NYT said I'm right".
Thank you for confirming your English comprehension problem.
From the article you dismiss:
“The reason why New York Times reporters are acting like rats fleeing a sinking ship with respect to the CIA’s war in Ukraine is that the Ukraine ship is sinking. Don’t take my word for it. The new US Intelligence Assessment for 2025 states 1) that Ukraine (the CIA) has substantially lost the conflict, and 2) nothing that the West has at its disposal will turn the situation around. Having a chair to sit in when the music stops is the political needle being threaded.
Russia in the past year has seized the upper hand in its full-scale invasion of Ukraine and is on a path to accrue greater leverage to press Kyiv and its Western backers to negotiate an end to the war that grants Moscow concessions it seeks. dni.gov.”
Further from the article:
“For those who may have forgotten, here is the leader of the Blue Team telling us that ‘Putin has already lost the war’ in mid-2023. Two years later, the New York Times is belatedly informing us that it was the Ukrainians who lost the war; that the US is blameless, if not heroic, for its ‘support’ of Ukraine; and that maybe the US should have gotten one-million citizens of a more deserving nation killed for the privilege.”
Now I am sure this won’t penetrate your ignorance but for others who can read I wanted to point out facts that show you don’t have a clue of whence you speak.
So like I said, the article you linked to contains some, possibly out of context quotes from a NYT article, which for some reason you didn't link to directly. Notice the quotes in question don't contain any facts, just opinion.
The DNI report which is cited is based on real time facts.
So why did you link to an article about an article about the report?
Only someone as feckless as you would make that a point - forest from the trees genius.
And yet you can't point to any actual trees, just biased third hand reports that a forest exists.
You are living proof that you can’t fix stupid
Says the person who keeps falling for Russian propaganda.