I’ll talk about these things in my next series, on truth.
We care about truth but not necessarily for the sake of it. I recommend Mercier and Sperber 2011 paper “Why do human reason”. I explain their theory here: optimallyirrational.com…
Enjoyed the linked article, thanks! "Scientists may be more rigorous, but lawyers are those best at convincing others." Yes indeed, and where success means popularity the lawyers have the advantage. But what about when success means survival? Surely the one who can build a shelter that doesn't cave in or site the well in the right place will be more likely to pass on their genes than the one who is likeable and convincing but wrong on the facts? We are social animals, but nature is a harsh taskmaster that cares nothing for charm. Thought provoking topic. Looking forward to future posts!
I’ll talk about these things in my next series, on truth.
We care about truth but not necessarily for the sake of it. I recommend Mercier and Sperber 2011 paper “Why do human reason”. I explain their theory here: https://www.optimallyirrational.com/p/why-reason-fails
Enjoyed the linked article, thanks! "Scientists may be more rigorous, but lawyers are those best at convincing others." Yes indeed, and where success means popularity the lawyers have the advantage. But what about when success means survival? Surely the one who can build a shelter that doesn't cave in or site the well in the right place will be more likely to pass on their genes than the one who is likeable and convincing but wrong on the facts? We are social animals, but nature is a harsh taskmaster that cares nothing for charm. Thought provoking topic. Looking forward to future posts!