Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Weaver's avatar

Really appreciate the clarity here—your framing of democracy as a conflict-resolution tool rather than a truth-finding mechanism is refreshingly grounded. But I wonder if the analysis stops short of the realist critique it sets out to offer.

You describe disagreement as something to be managed, but not as something shaped—by capital, media control, and structural power. What looks like broad consent often hides the fact that key issues (public ownership, taxing wealth, opposition to war crimes) are consistently excluded from the platforms of those with any real chance at power.

If the arena is rigged before the contest begins, isn’t that a bigger democratic illusion than the pursuit of the common good?

Expand full comment
Asher Frenkel's avatar

Why are you pointing to Arrow? Ordinal utility yields insufficient information for a social welfare function, sure. But cardinal utility doesn't. So, on what basis do you claim there is no common good?

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts